The Sykes-Picot agreement was a secret understanding concluded in May 1916, during World War I, between Great Britain & France, with the assent of Russia, for the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire.

The agreement led to the division of Turkish-held Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, & Palestine into various French & British-administered areas. The agreement took its name from its negotiators, Sir Mark Sykes of Britain & Georges Picot of France.

 

Establishment of Israel

The year had begun with Jewish & Arab armies each staging attacks on territory held by the other side.

The day after the state of Israel was declared five Arab armies from Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria & Iraq immediately invaded Israel but were repulsed, & the Israeli army crushed pockets of resistance.

Armistices established Israel's borders on the frontier of most of the earlier British Mandate Palestine.

Egypt kept the Gaza Strip while Jordan annexed the area around East Jerusalem & the land now known as the West Bank.

These territories made up about 25% of the total area of British Mandate Palestine.

 

The 1967 War

The victory heralded a new age of confidence & optimism for Israel & its supporters.

According to the UN, the conflict displaced another 500,000 Palestinians who fled to Egypt, Syria, Lebanon & Jordan.

 

Israel & Egypt make peace

Egypt & Israel signed the Camp David accords in September 1978 outlining "the framework for peace in the Middle East" which included limited autonomy for Palestinians.

Arab states boycotted Egypt for breaking ranks & negotiating a separate treaty with Israel.

Sadat was assassinated in 1981 by Islamist elements in the Egyptian army, who opposed peace with Israel, during national celebrations to mark the anniversary of the October war.

 

Israel invades Lebanon

From 16 to 18 September, the Phalangists - who were allied to Israel - killed hundreds of Palestinians in the Sabra & Shatila refugee camps as they were encircled by Israeli troops in one of the worst atrocities of nearly a century of conflict in the Middle East.

Mr. Sharon resigned from his post as defence minister after a 1983 Israeli inquiry concluded that he had failed to act to prevent the massacre.

 

PLO opens door to peace

The Palestinian National Council (a government-in-exile) convened in Algeria in November 1988

The US began dialogue with the PLO.

Israel continued to view the PLO as a terrorist organization with which it would not negotiate.

Instead, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir proposed elections in the occupied territories before negotiations on a self-rule agreement.

 

Sharon returns

The death toll soared as Sharon intensified existing policies such as assassinating Palestinian militants, air strikes & incursions into Palestinian self-rule areas.

Palestinian militants, meanwhile, stepped up suicide bomb attacks in Israeli cities.

The US spearheaded international efforts to calm the violence.

Envoy George Mitchell led an inquiry into the uprising, while CIA director George Tenet negotiated a ceasefire - but neither initiative broke the cycle of bloodshed.

 

West Bank re-occupied

Controversy raged as Israeli forces entered & captured the West Bank city of Jenin in April.

Israel began building a barrier in the West Bank, which it said was to prevent attacks inside Israel, although Palestinians feared an attempt to annex land.

Mr. Arafat faced heavy pressure to reform the Palestinian Authority & rein in the militants.

Palestinian attacks continued, met with periodic Israeli incursions & a ten-day siege which reduced much of Mr. Arafat's compound to rubble.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Islam's place in Israeli/Christian history was not always as peaceful as Moslems would want Christians & Jews to believe:

In the southern Spanish town of Granada, on July 10, 2003, a remarkable event marked a dramatic milestone in European history. Yet it achieved few headlines, & even today only a handful understand its full significance.

A Re-Reconquista?
 

The noted historian Edward Gibbon describes what might have happened to Europe if Martel & his Franks had failed to halt & reverse the Muslim drive:

"A victorious line of march [by the Muslim forces] had been prolonged above a thousand miles from the rock of Gibraltar to the banks of the Loire; the repetition of an equal space would have carried the Saracens to the confines of Poland & the Highlands of Scotland; the Rhine is not more impassable than the Nile or Euphrates, & the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames [near London]. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, & her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity & truth of the revelation of Mahomet" (Decline & Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol. 5, Ch. 52, Part II).

 

A Muslim France?
 Historically, it nearly happened. But as a result of Martel's fierce opposition, which ended Muslim advances
& set the stage for centuries of war thereafter, Islam moved no farther into Europe.

European schoolchildren learn about the Battle of Tours in much the same way that American students learn about Valley Forge & Gettysburg. For today's Europeans, however, yesterday's battles remind them of the modern challenge posed by Islam.

 

A Peaceful Invasion?

Europeans who once assumed that Muslim terrorism was an American problem are now discovering that it is their problem, too.

 

Europe, Rome & Islam

     In 2004, when the European Union added ten new member states - primarily from Eastern Europe - the Vatican took note. Pope John Paul II observed: "If the unity of the European peoples is to endure, it cannot be merely economic & political... The history of the formation of the European Nations keeps abreast with their evangelization. Consequently, despite the spiritual crises that have marked the life of the Continent in our day, its identity would be incomprehensible without Christianity... Only a Europe that does not eliminate but rediscovers its Christian roots, will be able to take up the challenges of the third millennium: peace, intercultural & interreligious dialogue, the safeguarding of creation. All believers in Christ of the European West & East are required to make their own contribution through open & sincere ecumenical cooperation" (Regina Caeli, May 2, 2004).
     Despite Vatican wishes, Europe has continued its drift toward secularism. When the European Union was codifying its proposed constitution, debate raged as to whether it would make reference to Europe's "Christian roots" as the Vatican had urged. Noting the degree of European opposition to such a reference, Vatican public affairs chief Joaquin Navarro-Valls lamented:

     "The Holy See cannot but express its distress over the opposition of some governments to the explicit recognition of the Christian roots of Europe. It is a question of disregard of the historical evidence & of the Christian identity of European peoples. The Holy See expresses heartfelt appreciation & gratitude to those governments that, aware of the past & of the historical horizon in which the new Europe is taking shape, worked to express concretely its recognized religious heritage. Not to be forgotten is the intense commitment of different entities to have the Christian heritage of Europe mentioned in this treaty, stimulating the reflection of political leaders, citizens, & public opinion on a question that is not secondary in the present national, European & world context" ("Pope Disappointed Christian Roots Not Recognized," Catholic Information Office, June 22,2004).

     Navarro -Valls was surely pleased that after the French & Dutch rejections of the proposed constitution last year, European Union officials chose to suspend the ratification process. Some see the suspension as a renewed opportunity to add a "Christian identity" clause to the EU constitution - a sentiment that may increase as a reaction to Muslim assertiveness sweeping across Europe. Yet such a clause would further worsen tensions between Islam & Europe.
     What will be the result of the increasing tension between Europe & Islam?
 Bible prophecy tells us what to look for. Jesus Christ told His followers to watch world events, so that they could observe the signs that would indicate His soon return. He said: "Then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power & glory. And then He will send His angels, & gather together His elect from the four winds, from the farthest part of earth to the farthest part of heaven. Now learn this parable from the fig tree: When its branch has already become tender, & puts forth leaves, you know that summer is near. So you also, when you see these things happening, know that it is near - at the doors!....
 And what I say to you, I say to all: Watch!" (Mark 13:26, 29, 37).
     Bible prophecy reveals that the rise of a "king of the South" will be one key sign leading up to Christ's return (for more on this topic, see page 22 of this issue). In Bible terminology, "south" here refers to a kingdom south of Jerusalem. Although Iran & Iraq may be part of, or allied with, this kingdom, simple geography demonstrates that the "head" of this kingdom will be to the south of these nations.
     Is the Muslim world likely to unite under one autocratic ruler?
 Some consider this farfetched, & point to increasing democratic tendencies in such countries as Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan & the Palestinian Authority. Even Iran has elections, though candidates must first be approved by Muslim religious authorities. But what have these elections produced?
 In Egypt, when elections were made more free, the radical Islamist group - the Muslim Brotherhood -quickly won 84 of the 454 seats in the nation's parliament. In Iraq, votes were split largely along sectarian lines, & many observers fear that ruling Shiites will try to institute an Islamic government as they did in Iran. And even though Iraq has held elections, the most powerful man in Iraq may be the unelected Shiite leader, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.
     Palestinian moves toward "democracy" have also been problematic. Last January, the world was shocked when Palestinian voters rejected the more moderate Fatah party & instead gave a solid majority in Palestine's legislative assembly to Hamas, a radical Islamic terrorist group that calls for the destruction of Israel & the imposition of a Muslim republic.
     In Iran, the election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has worsened tensions between Europe & the Muslim world. Ahmadinejad has described the Holocaust as "a myth" & has called for Israel to be "wiped off the map." He also anticipates the coming of a "Mahdi" or "Twelfth Imam" who will unite world Islam.
     Muslim cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri, from his mosque in London, England, has told his followers that the world should be run by a Muslim caliphate "sitting in the White House." Such comments obviously make Europeans nervous about the Muslim influence in their midst.
     Why are Muslims using democracy to install leaders who oppose democracy?
 Analyst Thomas L. Friedman writes: "You cannot go from Saddam to Jefferson without first going through Khomeini. Why?
 Because once you sweep away the dictator or king at the top of any Middle East state, you go into a free fall until you hit the mosque - as the U.S. discovered in Iraq. There is nothing between the ruling palace & the mosque. The secular autocratic regimes, like those in Egypt, Libya, Syria & Iraq never allowed for the emergence of any truly independent judiciary, media, progressive secular parties or civil society groups - from women's organizations to trade associations....
 That is why the minute any of these Arab countries hold free & fair elections, the Islamists burst ahead" ("Addicted to Oil," New York Times, February 1, 2006).
     Another way of looking at it is that, no matter how fervently Western governments seek to promote "democracy" or "reform" or "moderation" in these nations, it is God - not man - who sets up governments & takes them down (Daniel 2:21). Despite the continual attempts - & failures - of those who want to make the Muslim world into something it is not, God will carry out His plan. When it is time for the prophesied king of the South to rise, it will happen - whether or not analysts understand the reasons why.

 

North vs. South

     Daniel, a prophet from the tribe of Judah, lived in Babylon & Medo-Persia (near modern day Iraq) in the sixth century BC - long before the Greek & Roman empires, & more than a thousand years before Muhammad. Daniel 11, which was written during the reign of the Medo-Persian Empire, contains some remarkable prophecies, including those of the king of the South & the king of the North. Daniel's prophecies accurately foretold the history of Judea during the rise of the Greek empire - & they also foretell amazing events that will take place in our time.
     When Alexander the Great died, his kingdom was divided among his four main generals - as Daniel had prophesied long before (Daniel 8:21, 22; 11:4). One of those generals, Ptolemy-Soter, became ruler of a kingdom centered in Egypt, & is foretold as a king of the South (Daniel 11:5). Remember that Egypt is to the south of Jerusalem, & Syria is to the north. The prophecy also foretells specific events in the life of Ptolemy Philadelphus of Egypt (a king of the South) &
 his contention against Antichious II (Theos) who ruled a Syrian kingdom & is called the king of the North (v. 6). Daniel then describes that another generation of Egyptian kings (Ptolemy III) would wage war against the king of the North in Syria, invading through Judea (vv. 7-9). These specific events - & many others like them, described in Daniel 11 - took place in the recorded history of the Greek empire. Daniel's prophecies continue forward through the transition from a Greek empire to the Roman Empire, at which point we see the Roman Empire identified as the king of the North in prophecy.
     Beginning at verse 40, Daniel's time frame jumps to the "time of the end" - the time in which we now live. He writes: "And at the time of the end shall the king of the south contend with him; & the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, & with horsemen, & with many ships; &
 he shall enter into the countries, & shall overflow & pass through. He shall enter also into the glorious land, & many [countries] shall be overthrown; but these shall be delivered out of his hand: Edom, & Moab, & the chief of the children of Ammon. He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries; &
 the land of Egypt shall not escape. But he shall have power over the treasures of gold & of silver, & over all the precious things of Egypt; & the Libyans & the Ethiopians [indicating kingdoms south of Jerusalem] shall be at his steps" (Daniel 11:40 - 43, ASV).
     Daniel's remarkable prophecy foretells the rise of a great Middle Eastern power that will challenge a great European power. Regular readers of this magazine know that shortly before Jesus Christ returns, a powerful European leader will unite ten European kings or nations into a powerful political-religious system that will enforce its will fiercely on all who try to oppose it.
     This great power will go to war against the king of the South - certain nations of the Middle East. But rather than going to war to end tyranny or spread democracy, this power will seek its own ends through force that is anything but benevolent. Will this war be spurred by the contention between Europe & Islam?
 When a provocation as mild as a newspaper cartoon can bring many of the world's Muslims together in violent rage, how much more will major political &
 religious developments stoke the fires of anger between the historically Roman Catholic nations of Europe, & the nations of resurgent Islam?
 Watch world events in the light of Bible prophecy, & you will see this long-prophesied conflict set the stage for Jesus Christ's return & the establishment of His kingdom on earth.

 

Syria, Iran press defiant

Newspapers in Iran & Syria are in a defiant mood after being accused by Israel of involvement in the Hezbollah attacks on its territory.

Little direct response to the Israeli accusations has been observed, but Iranian & Syrian commentators have taken the opportunity to attack Israel, the West &
 even Arab leaders over the crisis.

One paper which does confront the Israeli accusations is Iran's Kayhan.

"We wish Israel's lies were true," it says. "The officials of the wild Zionist regime allege that Iran has equipped Hezbollah with long-distance missiles &
 Iranian officials honestly deny these allegations.

"They are right to do so. Because, to be honest, this is the sad truth."

Another Iranian paper, Siyasat-e-Ruz, calls on the government to "use a variety of mechanisms to help Hezbollah".

"The Islamic Republic of Iran shouldn't restrict its reaction to the Lebanese crisis to blaming Israel or staging demonstrations."

The paper urges the Iranian military "to support Hezbollah logistically & give it essential information... in order to drive the missiles into Tel Aviv".

According to Iran's Resalat, it is Israel's actions, not those of Hezbollah, Iran or Syria which threaten Middle East peace.

"By sending threatening messages to Iran & Syria & attacking Lebanon & Palestine, it proves that it is a regional threat for all the Middle East."

'True face of terrorism'Iran's Arabic-language paper Al-Vefagh argues that the crisis "reveals the true face of terrorism that extends from Tel Aviv to Washington, across the European capitals".

In Syria, a commentator in Al-Thawrah takes to task Arab leaders who fail to support Hezbollah.

"It is shameful to find some Arabs showing weakness in the face of the Israeli aggression & its terrorist ways, blaming the explosion on the Lebanese resistance," he says.

"They ignore the real reasons behind what is happening - Israel's arrogance, its expansionist aggressive approach, its insistence on occupying Arab land, its incessant threats to the Arabs & its attempts to silence any resisting voice."

Syria's Tishrin hails Hezbollah, saying that "only it had the courage to take the decision of confrontation".

And a commentary in the Syrian ruling party paper Al-Ba'th calls for "an international campaign with the participation of Arabs & the countries rejecting the policy of international hegemony & terrorism... to put an end to the brutal aggression on Lebanon & to lift the siege on the Palestinian people".

BBC Monitoring selects & translates news from radio, television, press, news agencies & the internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages. It is based in Caversham, UK, & has several bureaux abroad.

 

Israel's turbulent history

The 10,000 square miles of land west of the Jordan River & north of Egypt is one of the most hotly contested patches of earth on the planet. To most contemporary political bodies, this land constitutes the state of Israel, created by the United Nations in 1948, in large part as a response to the Holocaust of World War II. To others - particularly Arabs - the lands belong to the Palestinians, who assert a historical claim to the region.

The current lands of Israel & Palestine consist of the official state of Israel & the occupied territories: the Gaza Strip [from which Israeli troops withdrew in 2005], the West Bank & the Golan Heights. All of the Abrahamic traditions - among Jews, Muslims & Christians -- have their religious roots in the Middle East & in the city of Jerusalem, now part of Israel.

The Jewish religion incorporates the concept of the "promised land," described by the biblical patriarch Abraham, a concept that, in the late 19th century, began to take the shape of Zionism. Theodor Herzl, an Austrian Jew, founded the Zionist movement, a political ideology that supports a territorial homeland for the Jewish people on lands roughly equivalent to modern Israel. In 1917, the British foreign secretary issued the Balfour Declaration, which "
view[ed] with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people." Jews began settling in Palestine, even though Britain, the colonial ruler of the area, limited their immigration. Arabs were unhappy with the influx of settlers & attacked them, leading to the formation of the Jewish defense force, the Haganah. By 1947, battered by World War II, the British decided to pull out of Palestine, & the United Nations approved the 1947 Partition Plan to divide the land into two states.

A Land Divided

David Ben-Gurion, who became Israel's first prime minister, accepted the plan, but Arab leaders rejected it. Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon & Iraq joined the Palestinians in attacking & trying to eliminate the nascent state. Nevertheless, the Israelis prevailed & in ensuing years captured more territory west of the Jordan River. The 1949 Armistice Agreements ended the war & established the "Green Line," which designated a temporary truce line between Israel & its opponents. Most of the Arab population fled or was turned out during the war, creating 600,000 to 900,000 refugees. Waves of Jewish refugees flooded the country, many from Europe, but most fleeing Arab countries, & more than doubling the Israeli population.

In 1955, a new Egyptian government closed the Straits of Tiran & the Suez Canal to Israeli ships in response to a perceived spy threat. The following year, Israel invaded the Sinai Peninsula, backed by Britain & France, & swiftly conquered the Egyptians. The United States & the United Nations intervened & forced the British & French to withdraw, promising that the waters would remain open to Israeli ships. U.N. troops were stationed on the border to enforce the peace settlement.

The Six Day War & Yom Kippur

Tension continued, however, & fighting broke out again in 1967. In May of that year, Egypt requested the withdrawal of U.N. troops &, upon their departure, once again closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships. A blockade is generally viewed as an act of war, & this one proved no exception. On June 5, Israeli forces under Ariel Sharon commenced a massive air strike against Egyptian airfields, effectively eliminating them. In the days that followed, Israeli troops conquered the Egyptian troops defending Sinai. Israel also defeated assaults by Jordan from the east & Syria from the north. By June 10, Israel had agreed to a cease-fire, but during the fighting it had taken control of Sinai, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem & the Golan Heights.

The Six Day War of 1967 proved that Israel had the military might to dominate its neighbors. Now in control of three new territories, Israel had shifted the balance of power in the region in its favor.

In 1973, Egypt & Syria joined in a war against Israel on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, in an effort to regain the territories lost in 1967. After several weeks of fighting, Arab forces were rebuffed by Israeli troops. The war led to a Saudi oil embargo on the United States; gas prices skyrocketed; &
 the notorious fuel shortages of the 1970s began.

Negotiations Begin

In the late 1980s, fed up with occupation & Jewish settlements in former Palestinian territories, local Palestinians began the first intifada in the Gaza Strip &
 the West Bank, later joined by Yasser Arafat's Fatah militants. The skirmishes stayed mostly at the local level & were brought to an end by the landmark 1993 Oslo Accords, which established self-rule under the Palestinian National Authority in the occupied territories of Gaza & the West Bank. The accords were set up as an interim agreement that would be a precursor to the creation of a Palestinian state. Israel, however, accelerated the growth of settlements in the West Bank, & although Palestinians had agreed to forego violence, attacks on settlers continued.

Gaza-West Bank negotiations began in 1999 but were interrupted by the second intifada. Violence & chaos overtook the settled areas. Palestinian suicide bombers began attacking Israeli civilians, & the increasing instability within the Palestinian leadership further derailed the talks. Ariel Sharon's declaration of the hotly contested Temple Mount/Al-Haram As-Sharif site as eternally Israeli further enraged Palestinians.

In 2002, President George W. Bush said that the "road map"  for Arab-Israeli peace would entail a two-state solution, becoming the first American president to formally call for the formation of a Palestinian state.

Nevertheless, in that year, Israel started to build a controversial West Bank barrier -- part wall, part fence. The purpose, according to the Israeli government, was to prevent Palestinians from attacking Israeli civilians. After some dispute about where the barrier would go, it was redrawn to correspond closely with the Green Line. While Israel maintains that it is a security border, others worry that the barrier will serve as a political division that will isolate Palestinians from social services.

Arafat died in November 2004, & in January 2005, Mahmoud Abbas was chosen as the new Palestinian leader. This, along with the formation of a multipartisan Israeli government & the 2005 Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip, raised hopes for a solution to the turmoil in the Middle East.

It remains to be seen if Israel & the international community will accept the militant group Hamas in any future peace negotiations, following the group's landslide victory in the Palestinian elections last January. Hamas refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist, & is regarded as a terrorist organization by the United States & the European Union.

Sources: BBC News, CIA Factbook, MidEast Web, Palestine History, Anti-Defamation League, Wikipedia. (Note: Wikipedia is a free-content encyclopedia that it is written collaboratively by people from around the world.)



Since its capture of the whole of Jerusalem in 1967, Israel has put both East &West Jerusalem under its exclusive control & sovereignty.

Israel has put Arab East Jerusalem under Israeli civil law - as distinct from the military administration which for many years governed the occupied West Bank & the Gaza Strip.

The Israeli authorities redrew Jerusalem's municipal boundaries, extending them northwards & southwards. In 1980 Israel passed a law making its annexation of East Jerusalem explicit.

Major Israeli settlements now encircle the northern, eastern & southern perimeters of the city, creating a physical barrier between Palestinians in Jerusalem &
 those who live in the rest of the West Bank.

In a pre-emptive attack on Egypt on 5 June 1967 that drew Syria & Jordan into a regional war, Israel made massive territorial gains capturing the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Golan Heights & the Sinai Peninsula up to the Suez Canal.

The principle of land-for-peace that has formed the basis of Arab-Israeli negotiations is based on Israel giving up land won in the 1967 war in return for peace deals recognizing Israeli borders & its right to security. The Sinai Peninsula was returned to Egypt as part of the 1979 peace deal with Israel.